Wednesday, April 9, 2008

SRAMano


Look closely... very closely. It may look kosher but the reality is that some thing just a little off... Cyclingnews.com posted these photos a few days ago, for a closer look go there. Not that this is anything unusual for pro teams to be sponsored by one company and then actually ride a competitor just 'altered', but come on... I really want to like the new SRAM stuff, but lately there has been to many reasons not too, but that's another story for another day.

UPDATED 11:24PM EST 04.09.2008: GEOFF IN HIS INFINITE WISDOM AND SPARE TIME... ORIGINALLY POINTED THIS PICTURE OUT TO ME. So on the rare occasion I do give credit where it is due.

4 comments:

The Jackal said...

SRAM's cranks are way sexier then that

a.lo said...

Then why run the 'inferior' Durrrrr-Rachee [yes, I like to attempt to make it sound Italian]...

Makes me question the new BB shell of the Maddunes [yes, that's intentional] and their compatibility with SRAM/Bonty Cranks

GBK said...

Way to post my scoop without giving me credit. I slaved over cyclingnews.com articles before I noticed that. I doubt the BB compatibility is a problem, perhaps they don't work in the poor weather of the classics as well. Nothing shifts like a Shimano Crank.

bluecolnago said...

that's like finding out that there is no santa claus and elmer fudd shot the easter bunny.